TILTING AT WINDMILLS #9 - IMAGINE THE EXCITEMENT OF DR. PIERRE KORY WITH HIS VICTORY OVER THE FDA
As alluded to in Windmills 8, the country is awakening to the censorship, and Pierre never told me about the F DrAgon he just slayed. Bravo to his fortitude, and willingness to stick his neck out.
Here is the Headline and Story that Grabbed my Attention today. I saw this in my inbox:
and appreciating his being true to his Hippocratic Oath to do no harm. This is a list he detailed in the first paragraph of Saturday’s substack (read the whole thing by clicking the previous link).
His list of opponents in his battle “detail the campaign’s highly coordinated and sequentially timed actions between the FDA, CDC, AMA, APHA and corporate controlled media (i.e. late night hosts, news broadcasts, newspapers etc). Clearly, the goal of the campaign was to convince the public that ivermectin was a dangerous and ineffective horse de=wormer. And that list of adversaries goes beyond, on to the likes of Fauci, Big Pharma, but the most bellicose would be the FDA.
The campaign, as he mentions in his quote above, is an Advertising Firm’s handiwork.
“I do have to hand it to Weber Shandwick though because they devised a highly effective (lethal) campaign to end the use of ivermectin. That tweet went absolutely viral and became the FDA’s most popular tweet in history. I believe that tweet was the opening shot that completely turned from what had been isolated “battles” against ivermectin into an all-out war (my book details the more covert preceding actions by big Pharma).”
I DECIDED TO SEE WHAT AI COULD PRODUCE FROM THE KEYWORDS: KORY, IVERMECTIN AND CENSORSHIP
Using a website called Article Factory - this is what I surprisingly got. Fair and Balanced Journalism here with my comments in italics and my message to the company at the end of this Substack:
Censorship Surrounding the Use of Ivermectin Against COVID-19 Sparks Controversy — Introduction:
In the midst of a global pandemic, medical professionals and regulatory bodies have been engaged in an ongoing debate regarding potential treatments for COVID-19. sjm comment —> unfortunately the publicist made us look like lunatics. The “debate” was not made evident during the midst of the pandemic but has gained traction in recent months
One such controversy surrounds the use of Ivermectin, an anti-parasitic drug that has gained attention as a possible treatment option. However, this promising avenue faces significant censorship challenges that have left many questioning whether it is being unfairly dismissed. sjm comment —> AI treats this as if it’s current events and not an old story finally seeing it’s way through the murky waters thanks to the persistence of Kory, and the others like McCullough, Malone, Senator Johnson (Wi), Kirsch, RFK Jr., Gold and Sapphire to name but a few of the courageous to take on the Gov’t.
The Emergence of Ivermectin: Ivermectin
It is widely utilized in veterinary medicine to treat various parasitic infections and has also proven effective against certain human parasitic diseases. In recent months, several studies and anecdotal reports have emerged suggesting its potential efficacy in combating COVID-19. Frontline COVID Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), led by Dr. Pierre Kory, has been at the forefront of advocating for the use of Ivermectin as part of a comprehensive treatment strategy.
Censorship Concerns:
Despite mounting evidence and support from reputable medical professionals like Dr. Kory, there appears to be persistent censorship surrounding discussions on Ivermectin's role in fighting COVID-19.
1) Suppression by Mainstream Media: One prominent aspect contributing to this censorship is alleged suppression by mainstream media outlets which largely dismiss any positive findings related to Ivermectin's effectiveness against COVID-19. Critics argue that this selective reporting undermines critical scientific discourse necessary for advancing potential solutions during a crisis. sjm writes: social ostracism for citizens, public shaming and license suspension and fines for the MD’s many of whom were not against vaccination until this vaccine was authorized without adequate scrutiny of the trials or the approval process by the FDA
2) Dismissal by Regulatory Bodies: Regulatory bodies such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have yet to grant full approval for using Ivermectin specifically against COVID-19 due to insufficient clinical trials supporting its efficacy or safety profile in this context. While cautious skepticism can be warranted given prioritizing public health safety, some contend that dismissing Ivermectin outright without further exploration stifles potential breakthroughs. sjm comment —> yet the vaccine beat it to market faster than Hillary was able to use BleachBit.
The Role of Dr. Pierre Kory:
Dr. Pierre Kory, a renowned pulmonary and critical care specialist, has played a pivotal role in advocating for the use of Ivermectin as part of COVID-19 treatment protocols. His impassioned testimony before the Senate Homeland Security Committee in December 2020 garnered widespread attention and highlighted the potential benefits of this drug.
1) Controversial Testimony: Dr. Kory's testimony emphasized existing evidence suggesting Ivermectin's ability to mitigate viral replication and reduce mortality rates among critically ill patients when utilized alongside standard therapies. However, his claims were met with skepticism from some quarters, leading to further debate over its merits.
2) FDA Settlement: In March 2021, FLCCC filed a citizen petition urging the FDA to review their data on Ivermectin for COVID-19 use. The group alleged that censorship was hampering access to potentially life-saving information by limiting public awareness about alternative treatments during a time of crisis. Conclusion: Censorship surrounding discussions on using Ivermectin against COVID-19 raises significant concerns regarding scientific objectivity and patient welfare during this global health crisis. While regulatory bodies prioritize rigorous clinical trials before granting full approval for any treatments, it is essential not to dismiss promising options prematurely without thorough exploration or engagement with dissenting viewpoints. Addressing these concerns requires an open dialogue that encourages continued research into potential therapeutic avenues like Ivermectin while maintaining high standards for safety and efficacy evaluations through comprehensive clinical trials.
As the world grapples with rising infection rates and evolving variants of SARS-CoV-2, it is vital that medical professionals and regulatory bodies remain vigilant in their pursuit of effective treatments while respecting scientific integrity and patient well-being above all else. sjm comment: and recognizing that what was done at the behest of Big Pharma was:
A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY IN VIOLATION OF THE NUREMBURG LAWS!
My Back-Story:
Almost 25 years ago, I met Dr. Jeffrey Hoos, a guru to dentists, in Philadelphia for breakfast and to attend his program at the Warwick Hotel. He spoke of giraffes, and the courage it takes to stick one’s neck out. Around the same time it became my motivation to take on the American Dental Association over its endorsement of the use of mercury in peoples mouths, and rather than speaking to a small group, I risked my license to uphold what I believed. The ADA had long ago determined it was an ethical violation to speak-ill unto their precious mercury fillings.
It was also then that I told the ADA that acceptance to dental school needed to include a 23 and me test showing no genetic susceptibility to inability to detoxify mercury. Dentists had ignominiously been specified as suicidal. Dental students too, have committed suicide. Could it be that dental offices and schools have a high level of Hg in the atmosphere? I abandoned my case when it became a First Amendment issue. I was too young to be forced out of the profession.
PS- I sent the following to the AI corporation I used to let them see what I wrote, and know what I think about their product:
I have used Article Factory to write the second half of my Substack. My commentary is italics following where I felt augmentation was needed. I understand that human experience of programmers enters into the AI program. Being the author of The Covid Planet since the ophthalmologist in Wuhan first began warning the world, it is my opinion that the tide has changed, and the world is realizing the vaccine, the shutdowns, the distancing, and the mandates were all a ruse, and the truth is coming out fairly rapidly now. I think that the AI could have been corrected a bit to adjust for these new revelations Feel free to subscribe to my Substack for further reference and follow the links. Thank you, it was a very interesting experience.