TILTING AT WINDMILLS 6 - Irregularities in the trial data
Ironically, this part of the story concentrates on something I saw right from the beginning of my amateur data analysis. I needed to text Bob Walker (whom many of my dental friends know).
This is something I had texted to him at the beginning, 4 years ago. Pay attention to the date.
The controversy, sparked by the paper below which many of the names you should be familiar with by now has been the manipulation of the data by Pfizer and Moderna, and the inability of government agencies to find a capable analyst. It should be obvious to anyone with scientific training, is that a test group (groomed by the lead investigator to be HEALTHY, VIRILE, YOUNG, NO UNDERLYING DISEASE, AND DEFINITELY NOT PREGNANT) of only 175 individuals and 8 of them still got Covid is not an effective preventative (especially given the short time frame from inoculation to reporting).
Circumspection – because of issues of censorship, I have taken the liberty of downloading the entire document below before it disappears quicker than the data on a BleachBit-washed harddrive.
This is my review and annotation of the Lessons Learned publication by Mead, Seneff, Wolfinger, Rose, Denhaerynck, Kirsch and McCullough. Publication in Cureus, 1/24/24. Peer-reviewed for almost three months.
The following numbers pertain to the left marginal annotations of a .pdf of pages 6 - 8 of the above 38 page article:
Regarding the failure by the FDA to disclose cardiomyopathy as a sequela of Covid vaccination is a major crime that deserves thorough investigation. See my earlier Substack on this criminal issue. LINK
More tomorrow!